Despite increased prominence and funding of global health initiatives, attempts to scale up health services in developing countries are failing, with serious implications for achieving the Millennium Development Goals. A new paper argues that a key first step is to get a more realistic understanding of health systems, using the lens of complex adaptive systems.

Much ongoing work in development and humanitarian aid is based on the idea  of ‘scaling up’ effective solutions. Healthcare is one of the areas where this idea has played a central role – from WHO’s Health for All in the 1960s to UNICEF’s child healthcare programmes, from rolling out HIV-AIDS, malaria and TB treatments to the package of interventions delivered to achieve the Millennium Development Goal on health.

However, despite the fact there are many cost-effective solutions to health problems faced in developing countries, many agencies are still frustrated in their attempts to deliver them at scale. This may be because of a widepread failure to understand the nature of health systems.

Melissa Leach, director of the superb STEPS Centre, has described health systems as:

complex systems made up of networks of many heterogeneous components that interact non-linearly. While pathways of change can be shaped by governance and are influenced by path dependencies, they are not entirely controllable or predictable; there will always be uncertainties and unintended consequences and new ‘emergent’ interactions and behaviours.’

If we accept this eminently sensible description, then it is little wonder that scaling up efforts continue to be frustrated. The paper by Ligia Paina and David H Peters, published in Health Policy and Planning in August, argues that there is a drastic need for a shift in thinking:

…from the current models around scaling up health services, which revolve around linear, predictable processes, to models that embrace uncertainty, non-linear processes, the uniqueness of local context and emergent characteristics.”

Their argument is supported by the fact that existing assumptions about the nature and hoped-for successes of scaling up have led to a lot of disappointments. Moreover, these efforts ‘offer little insight on how to scale up effective interventions in the future.’

The paper explores 5 concepts of complexity science, illustrated below.


All of these ideas carry relevant lessons for the design, planning, implementation and evaluation of health policy and programmes. As the authors conclude:

The implications include paying more attention to local context, incentives and institutions, as well as anticipating certain types of unintended consequences that can undermine scaling up efforts, and developing and implementing programmes that engage key actors through transparent use of data for ongoing problem-solving and adaptation.”

The authors close with a proposal that future efforts to scale up should adapt and apply complex systems models and methodologies which have been used in other fields but which remain underused in public health. These include network scinece approaches, modelling techniques, and tools to better understand systems dynamics.

The potential benefits are clearly stated:

This can help policy makers, planners, implementers and researchers to explore different and innovative approaches for reaching populations in need with effective, equitable and efficient health services.”

These ideas are already being applied in practice, The authors are involved in a capacity strengthening programme on complexity and health systems in China. Separately, the WHO has published a guide to using systems analysis in health systems strengthening, which builds on a number of the concept described above.

These are all fascinating developments, and suggest that health may be a key area where the ideas from complexity science can prove of tangible value for development and humanitarian work.

Interested readers can hear an podcast about the article here, with David Peters talking about his ideas and experiences (and me saying a few words about the history of complexity science and the relevance for health efforts.) David has also blogged about it here.

Previous Aid on the Edge posts relevant to this topic include MDGS and theories of change, Scan HIV-AIDS Globally, Reinvent Locally and How do you solve a problem like malaria?.

About these ads

Join the conversation! 5 Comments

  1. […] ever excellent Ben Ramalingam posts on the complexity challenges of scaling up aid projects. He and the paper he reports have many interesting and valid points, and yet the dry analysis […]

    Reply
  2. For my usual reduction to CS, the problem may be that to begin with, you need an emergent system, to help evolve the infrastructure efficiently, to a point where it is sustainable at a sufficiently large scale.

    However, what you want to end up with is a distributed service architecture. Where disperate services are spread across a vast area, but that request are mediated by a separate layer. See the ESB towards the end of this for an analogous layer: http://russellobrien.hubpages.com/hub/Integration-Architecture-Explained

    i.e. routing people to the relevant service is half the problem. And that tends to best be handled by something quite bespoke.

    Not easy

    Reply
  3. Excellent post, Ben. I would underscore that we seem to do little sharing of past attempts at scale-up and as you note learning from them “how to scale up effective interventions in the future.” I recently did a search for articles on scale-up and they were hard to come by. This post moves us further in the sharing direction. Your readers might also be interested in this wiki http://globalscale.wikispaces.com/Resources where I will add your post.

    Reply
  4. […] not work well a wider scales due to unanticipated problems and bottlenecks. Ben Ramalingam recently blogged on exactly some of the new challenges that occur as one scales up. This doesn’t mean that the […]

    Reply
  5. […] experience seems to chime in with others’. Paina and Papers put in in their analysis of scaling up efforts in the health sector argued that we need to shift “from the current models around scaling up .. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

About Ben Ramalingam

I am a freelance consultant and writer specialising on international development and humanitarian issues. I am currently working on a number of consulting and advisory assignments for international agencies. I am also writing a book on complexity sciences and international aid which will be published by Oxford University Press. I hold Senior Research Associate and Visiting Fellow positions at the Institute of Development Studies, the Overseas Development Institute, and the London School of Economics.

Category

Accountability, Evaluation, Evolution, Healthcare, Innovation, Leadership, Malaria, Public Policy, Reports and Studies, Strategy