<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Aid on the Edge of Chaos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aidontheedge.info/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aidontheedge.info</link>
	<description>Exploring complexity &#38; evolutionary sciences in foreign aid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:39:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Aid Leadership Paradox by Nick Obolensky</title>
		<link>http://aidontheedge.info/2010/08/24/the-aid-leadership-paradox/#comment-2110</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Obolensky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidontheedge.info/?p=989#comment-2110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those interested in &quot;Complex Adaptive Leadership&quot; (CAL) my book on the subject was published the same time as Ben&#039;s article - a real example of complexity and morphic resonance in action! There is a deep underlying flow in the affairs of humanity of which CAL is a manifestation...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those interested in &#8220;Complex Adaptive Leadership&#8221; (CAL) my book on the subject was published the same time as Ben&#8217;s article &#8211; a real example of complexity and morphic resonance in action! There is a deep underlying flow in the affairs of humanity of which CAL is a manifestation&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MDGs and theories of change by waterwg</title>
		<link>http://aidontheedge.info/2010/10/05/mdgs-and-theories-of-change/#comment-2105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[waterwg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidontheedge.info/?p=1190#comment-2105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://2015waterworkinggroup.wordpress.com/2012/01/26/16/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Post 2015 Water Monitoring Working Group&lt;/a&gt; and commented: 
Old post, includes apt warning against the temptation to rank ease of measuring over importance
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reblogged this on <a href="http://2015waterworkinggroup.wordpress.com/2012/01/26/16/" rel="nofollow">Post 2015 Water Monitoring Working Group</a> and commented:<br />
Old post, includes apt warning against the temptation to rank ease of measuring over importance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Complexity and Growing Up by Ignace Pollet</title>
		<link>http://aidontheedge.info/2011/10/20/complexity-and-growing-up/#comment-2100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ignace Pollet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidontheedge.info/?p=2367#comment-2100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To deal with complexity means not to accept it, but to fight it and learn to to abolish institutions.

Growing complexity is not a law of nature but a deliberate choice. Day by day, new institutions are created in order to channel all sorts of tasks and problems. However, old institutions - no matter how obsolete - tend not to be abolished. This is because of the phenomenon of self-referentiality: after a while an institute becomes its own goals, creating its own rules and regulations, etc. In a functional society, (Adam Smith&#039;s division of labour) groups of people are dependent on the existence of this or that institution, even if it is no longer serving its original purpose. This makes that institutions fiercely resist any attempt to modify it, let alone abolish it. 
And that&#039;s exactly what is needed in order to reduce complexity: to abolish old institutions, rules, laws, practices etc. Some meta-institutional organism (state?) should do this by force, as it will never happen voluntarily.
The alternative is that people adapt to complexity. Ideally they are to become multi-causal gnomes (computers). This however is not a neutral process. Some gnomes will be better than others. And it is good for consultant&#039;s businesses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To deal with complexity means not to accept it, but to fight it and learn to to abolish institutions.</p>
<p>Growing complexity is not a law of nature but a deliberate choice. Day by day, new institutions are created in order to channel all sorts of tasks and problems. However, old institutions &#8211; no matter how obsolete &#8211; tend not to be abolished. This is because of the phenomenon of self-referentiality: after a while an institute becomes its own goals, creating its own rules and regulations, etc. In a functional society, (Adam Smith&#8217;s division of labour) groups of people are dependent on the existence of this or that institution, even if it is no longer serving its original purpose. This makes that institutions fiercely resist any attempt to modify it, let alone abolish it.<br />
And that&#8217;s exactly what is needed in order to reduce complexity: to abolish old institutions, rules, laws, practices etc. Some meta-institutional organism (state?) should do this by force, as it will never happen voluntarily.<br />
The alternative is that people adapt to complexity. Ideally they are to become multi-causal gnomes (computers). This however is not a neutral process. Some gnomes will be better than others. And it is good for consultant&#8217;s businesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Humanitarian Groundhog Day by Like Funding Innovation &#124; humanitarian.info</title>
		<link>http://aidontheedge.info/2011/03/24/the-humanitarian-groundhog-day/#comment-2086</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Like Funding Innovation &#124; humanitarian.info]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 10:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidontheedge.info/?p=1879#comment-2086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] on The Humanitarian Groundhog Day, the always efficacious Ben Ramalingam pointed out the coordination is a wicked problem [pdf] – [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on The Humanitarian Groundhog Day, the always efficacious Ben Ramalingam pointed out the coordination is a wicked problem [pdf] – [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Interview with leading complexity theorist Stuart Kauffman by Brandon</title>
		<link>http://aidontheedge.info/2010/11/04/an-interview-with-leading-complexity-theorist-stuart-kauffman/#comment-2085</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidontheedge.info/?p=639#comment-2085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post. I&#039;ll be sure to bookmark your blog.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I&#8217;ll be sure to bookmark your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on South Africa&#8217;s democracy: Complexity theory in action by rolam</title>
		<link>http://aidontheedge.info/2011/12/16/south-africas-democracy-complexity-theory-in-action/#comment-2083</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rolam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidontheedge.info/?p=2465#comment-2083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am also confused with the post.
Being highly interested in complexity theory and especially the works of Edgar Morin, I fail to reconcile how could the four events mentioned above be major catalysts of the complex environment in which South Africa finds itself.

Whilst these events are important, they are secondary in respect of what&#039;s coming South Africa&#039;s way.

In my opinion, what is more important for South Africans is &quot;how can South African institutions mitigate the external forces&quot;?

To name but a few:
* the macro-economical forces at play currently (gold price, currency wars, escalating debt, rising inflation), 
* the dramatically changing political scene (politics in the US and Europe are becoming more polarized than ever with less and less traction for the mainstream parties),
* the tension in the Middle East and the implications of a military conflict in the region,
* the behavior of the Chinese government and the state of the Chinese economy.

These are, in my humble opinion, some of the major forces that will drive uncertainty albeit the Unknowns Unknowns are probably more powerful,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also confused with the post.<br />
Being highly interested in complexity theory and especially the works of Edgar Morin, I fail to reconcile how could the four events mentioned above be major catalysts of the complex environment in which South Africa finds itself.</p>
<p>Whilst these events are important, they are secondary in respect of what&#8217;s coming South Africa&#8217;s way.</p>
<p>In my opinion, what is more important for South Africans is &#8220;how can South African institutions mitigate the external forces&#8221;?</p>
<p>To name but a few:<br />
* the macro-economical forces at play currently (gold price, currency wars, escalating debt, rising inflation),<br />
* the dramatically changing political scene (politics in the US and Europe are becoming more polarized than ever with less and less traction for the mainstream parties),<br />
* the tension in the Middle East and the implications of a military conflict in the region,<br />
* the behavior of the Chinese government and the state of the Chinese economy.</p>
<p>These are, in my humble opinion, some of the major forces that will drive uncertainty albeit the Unknowns Unknowns are probably more powerful,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What are leaders really for? by stephanie</title>
		<link>http://aidontheedge.info/2011/12/07/what-are-leaders-really-for/#comment-2076</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stephanie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 04:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidontheedge.info/?p=2431#comment-2076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You might enjoy this relevant TED talk on the power shift we&#039;re perhaps/hopefully leading up to right now: http://www.ted.com/talks/paddy_ashdown_the_global_power_shift.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might enjoy this relevant TED talk on the power shift we&#8217;re perhaps/hopefully leading up to right now: <a href="http://www.ted.com/talks/paddy_ashdown_the_global_power_shift.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ted.com/talks/paddy_ashdown_the_global_power_shift.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What are leaders really for? by bradbell.tv</title>
		<link>http://aidontheedge.info/2011/12/07/what-are-leaders-really-for/#comment-2062</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bradbell.tv]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidontheedge.info/?p=2431#comment-2062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Occupy needs a leader like WikiLeaks needs a leader. Leaders allow us to turn attention from ideas to personalities, which are easier to demonise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Occupy needs a leader like WikiLeaks needs a leader. Leaders allow us to turn attention from ideas to personalities, which are easier to demonise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The globalisation of vulnerability by World Economic Forum Report is Da Bomb &#171; Jdulgeroff&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://aidontheedge.info/2011/01/11/the-globalisation-of-vulnerability/#comment-2059</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[World Economic Forum Report is Da Bomb &#171; Jdulgeroff&#8217;s Weblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 21:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://aidontheedge.wordpress.com/?p=1654#comment-2059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://aidontheedge.info/2011/01/11/the-globalisation-of-vulnerability/  Like this:LikeBe the first to like this post. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://aidontheedge.info/2011/01/11/the-globalisation-of-vulnerability/" rel="nofollow">http://aidontheedge.info/2011/01/11/the-globalisation-of-vulnerability/</a>  Like this:LikeBe the first to like this post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on South Africa&#8217;s democracy: Complexity theory in action by Jim</title>
		<link>http://aidontheedge.info/2011/12/16/south-africas-democracy-complexity-theory-in-action/#comment-2048</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 00:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidontheedge.info/?p=2465#comment-2048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am confused by this post and its relation to complexity. By any standard, South Africa is devolving due to its collapse of the rule of law. Economic complexity demands at least a modicum of institutional fairness and property rights for specialization and resultant production and GDP to rise.

And from the macro level, socialism or totalitarianism is the antithesis of complexity. It does not allow self-organization. Corrupt socialism is even worse. I thought we learned that some time ago.

Hopefully you can clarify my confusion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am confused by this post and its relation to complexity. By any standard, South Africa is devolving due to its collapse of the rule of law. Economic complexity demands at least a modicum of institutional fairness and property rights for specialization and resultant production and GDP to rise.</p>
<p>And from the macro level, socialism or totalitarianism is the antithesis of complexity. It does not allow self-organization. Corrupt socialism is even worse. I thought we learned that some time ago.</p>
<p>Hopefully you can clarify my confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

